Finally – My Long Lost NRI Returned Brother
I’ve found my NRI-returned-to-India long-lost brother! That’s right, folks, it appears that I have hit upon a guy who will keep me sane because he’s going through the same crap I am! It’s been a while since I came across someone who was humorous, intelligent, had the ability to make a good philosophical point, and, most importantly, someone who’s experiences I could relate to! Tonight, I found one such soul - neoIndian – also a non-resident Indian (NRI) who returned to India.
Here are a couple of Neo’s posts that are right on the money:
a) Return to India myth #2. Neo is absolutely right when he says the following:
Perhaps the most unsettling realization for Neo after his return to India has been this: For the rest of his life, he will almost certainly feel different from the local population – no matter where he stays in the world.
It’s the same for yours truly! Damn! Double damn!
But yes, two years after moving to Bangalore, it’s been a “challenge” (don’t you just love euphemistic management jargon?) for the Neos to diversify their friends circle away from other US-returned people.
Neo’s neighbors (many of whom have never lived outside India), would be a great natural addition to his list of friends (and be a great source of convenient next-door play dates for Junior), but there are huge differences.
Granted Neo and his reasons for the differences are not the same as mine, the fact remains that what he says is absolutely right and relevant for my situation too. I would love to build friendships with my neighbors and my cousins. I’ve tried! Unfortunately, I cannot completely (don’t you just love my ability to put a positive spin on things?) relate to the folks I meet here, even someone like my cigar friend. My family keeps heckling me, much like they heckle Neo apparently, which I have to admit I am having great pleasure in knowing about. (Alright, alright, keep your panties on – it’s not a sick pleasure. I feel his pain. It’s just nice to be reminded that others are going through the same thing every once in a while!) Worse than my neighbors and cousins is trying to understand the people in the village of North Delhi and to try to get them to understand me. To think only folks with a certain background will “get me” and accept me for who I am is truly sad.
(As an aside, my c.f. has recently been telling me that I need to be Indian since I’m living in India. The other day, in quite an angry manner I must add, she said either I behave like Indians or I should leave India. I was a bit flabbergasted to tell you the truth! I had never had someone tell me in such serious terms that I should leave the country! Unfortunately, I cannot do either right now. This much is true, though, large degree of adoption of Indian behavior will never be possible for me.)
Now, where do I find other US-returned people in New Delhi? In fact, last few weeks I have thinking of just that – meeting new people. I thought maybe I can move near the sports complex in South Delhi and use sports as the medium. Meeting people in The Village (henceforth, my term for North Delhi) is not an option. I know I will have better luck hanging out with the crowd in a village in Rajasthan. I might be able to make South Delhi work (okay, it’s sort of like the round peg in the square box thinking I’m following here, but you have to give me kudos for my very positive attempt of faking my reality into reality).
Bombay is possible. It’s a thought that again tried its damndest to shift its way from the back of my mind to the front a few days ago. I didn’t let it hang around very long, I pushed it right back. I can’t possibly make a move to Bombay at this time. It has taken me two years and I’m finally familiar with Delhi. I have a sense of the good and bad parts of town. I know the places to hang out. I can’t go back to square one again! Or can I? Should I think about this?
North American Indian Sense of Humor
I had a blast at the Big Laugh show this past week. Papa CJ opened the show. The guy isn’t very funny. In fact, he wasn’t funny at all. I wanted to have a good time and wanted the crowd to get into it. I was even force-laughing just so I could psyche myself into enjoying. You know, sometimes you have to get the engines started. Unfortunately, it just didn’t happen. Thank God, Papa CJ wasn’t the main comedian for the night. I was surprised that this guy named Sugar Sammy was the main act.
Sugar Sammy, if you haven’t heard about him like I hadn’t until last week, is an Indian from Canada. He’s Punjabi to boot! The guy was good, relevant, and funny. He saved the night from being a disaster. One of the first things you noticed about Sammy was that he was enjoying himself! Papa CJ was sort of just there, you know just around, not really having fun. He was trying a bit too hard. It seemed like he was waiting for the audience to get him riled up. The comedian needs to get the audience engaged and not the other way around! And the audience can tell if the performer is enjoying himself or not! The little matter of the material being good also makes a difference!
I thought Sammy was funny probably because I could relate to the things he was joking about. He made fun of Punjabis and how when we curse, we use half the words and eat the other half. There was stuff on hajmola (it’s used to cure every ailment). He made fun of the Kamasutra (why are the pictures not pictures but drawings?). There were lines about a Punjabi guy making love. He talked about dating a Lebanese woman. His humor was from the perspective of a non-Indian Indian, hands down, no doubts about it. He reminded me of Russell Peters in a way and even more so now that I reflect back on the show.
At the end of the show, I went up to tell him he was great. I had expected to hear Papa CJ and I got treated to a North American Indian doing comedy in India. If you get a chance to catch his show, you should.
Ted Kennedy – Family, Life, and Lessons – Part 4
The article in my last post was the introduction to the Newsweek series. You can get to all the sub-articles through that. Here’s my next citation.
What Teddy Can Teach Us, Evan Thomas, Newsweek, August 29, 2009 from the magazine issue dated September 7, 2009
http://www.newsweek.com/id/214247
- He possessed two qualities rarely found in our elected representatives: he did not hog the limelight and, and he was never petty.
- Part of just showing up for Kennedy was presiding as paterfamilias at endless family graduations, weddings, and funerals.
- Kennedy devoured briefing books – huge binders stuffed with mind numbing research – the way most people read novels, recalls Jim Manley, an aide to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.
- Kennedy could posture and yell on the Senate floor, but he managed to make his foes into friends.
- Kennedy could be harsh in debate, but he was careful to make amends. He never let himself get too offended by others. After Sen. Strom Thurmond would rail against him at labor-committee hearings, recalls Kennedy’s longtime aide Melody Miller, “he would amble over to Thurmond and throw his arm over his shoulders and laughingly say, ‘Now, Strom, don’t get too upset. Come on over to Judiciary and I’ll give you some judges!’ “
- Kennedy was at this best – at his most genuine – when other people were in trouble and feeling abandoned.
- Kennedy thought a lot about things, he recalled, and began reading all the books he hadn’t read in college, his family joked. Maybe it was his Catholic faith, deepened by tragedy and redemption.
Hogging the limelight has a big affect on getting things done. Those two things can be directly opposite most of the time. If you want to get results, you cannot worry about the limelight. You just have to know you’re doing what you’re doing to achieve your goal. If you’re around decent people, you’ll get the limelight you deserve. Heck, if you stick around long enough, you’ll get it even with not-so-decent people around you.
It’s not as simple as that, of course. I used to believe that you shouldn’t worry about credit, just do your job and that’s what matters. I didn’t even know you should look for credit. For years, I was turned-off by what I saw as the American capitalist notion of self-promotion and the Hindu value of humility. I was torn between the two with a definite skew towards humility. I thought self-promotion was evil. Really, I did. It’s probably because I was humble to a fault. I still am in many regards and don’t toot my own horn.
I’ve learned over the years, though, that telling people of what you’ve done isn’t necessarily bad. In fact, in many ways, it’s very important to do that, both in your professional and personal life. People get to know you, your character, how you think, and your priorities by the things you tell them. If those things happen to give you credit, then that is what they do. My thinking on the evilness of self-promotion has turned around to the point it doesn’t turn me off when I see it. You cannot tell everyone but you do need to tell the people that matter – your spouse, your family, your boss. Who you deem important to know is important.
I consider being petty just plain-ol bad. There is little reason to be small-minded about things. I know people who fall into that category. If they’re people I hardly meet, it doesn’t really bother me. I’ve also been in situations where it’s been with people I interact with regularly. Now, that’s when it gets annoying. That’s when you remember that breathing deeply helps keep you calm!
One of the things Ted Kennedy apparently did really well was reading, i.e., preparation. Many of his colleagues and family members mentioned that during his funeral. I am always reading news online or trade magazines. I also enjoy reading the latest in management books. There’s so much to know and understand and it doesn’t happen overnight. You need to keep up with this stuff continuously. Still I think I can improve on this. I need to read more targeted trade literature.
One of the things I found the funniest was when people said Ted Kennedy would yell and scream and vigorously debate on the Senate floor and then turn around and put his arm around you and ask something like “How did I do?”. I think this is so critical. I was like this and still am with many people but I do need to do more of it. Because of a tough situation as a twenty-something adult, I was repeatedly in situations where cutting things off was the best thing to do. In hindsight, I have realized that cutting things off became too much a part of me. I need to re-acquire Ted’s ability.
Since a difficult relationship with one of my paternal aunts, I have thought about the things that makes people tick. It is interesting to me. People are interesting to me. Why do they behave the way they do? Why do they think the way they do? I ask a lot of probing questions because I like to get down to the root of things. I’m very curious about people, behaviors, and attitudes.
When you go through a tough period, something so severe that it causes post-traumatic stress disorder (see the “Diagnosis” section) or whatever is the appropriate term, there is a compassion switch that gets turned on in you. You relate to those who suffer. It can create a deep desire to bond with people and to help people. Sometimes, that is not so good but that is what happens with severe traumatic situations. Your brain gets rewired. The death of Ted’s brothers had the affect of rewiring his brain!
Ted Kennedy – Family, Life, and Lessons – Part 1
I’d like to share a few heart-warming, inspirational, historical, poignant, and just funny articles on Ted Kennedy. Here is the first.
The Liberal Lion, Neal Gabler, Newsweek, August 27, 2009
http://www.newsweek.com/id/213869/output/print
- On JFK’s death on Bobby Kennedy: “…his brother’s death had such a profound effect on him that it seemed to radicalize his politics. It was if he had suffered some deep, irreparable wound that suddenly connected him to everyone else who was also suffering. His liberalism was a function of that empathy – of his own tortured soul and the feeling that it was his job to represent the afflicted and powerless.
- In effect, the Kennedy family was a small welfare state, supported by the father’s tremendous wealth but bound by a powerful sense of community in which each member was responsible for every other member.
- But the Republicans found success by flogging their own version of America, one that saw the country not as a community but as a collection of self-interested individualists.
I can relate to each of these statements, which is (duh!) the reason that I have quoted them specifically. One point to clarify: I don’t have the riches of my parents. The rest is accurate.
While I believe each individual must pull their own weight – learn, put forth effort, sacrifice, contribute, and achieve – my values agree with those of the Kennedy family and I deny the notion of self-interested individualists in a country (or a family). Unfortunately, as I learned by interacting with each member one at a time, my family seems to be people who are by all intents and purposes individualists. This seems to come as innately to them as the opposite comes to me. This disagreement on the definition of a family’s core identity has also contributed to some of the problems we’ve had. At various times in our lives, that’s an understatement.
The reason for this, I believe, has to do with the migration of our family from India to the United States. Our age and state of maturity when we moved and our openness to the new life led to us picking up different parts of American culture. This does not mean we were not all open, we probably were, but because of multiple reasons we were open to different kinds of things. Each person’s personality undoubtedly played a part in it as well.

leave a comment